The Dharma of Dancing
Lama Thubten Yeshe
|
|
|
After an intensive meditation course taught by Lama
Zopa Rinpoche at Chenrezig Institute, Australia, in
1979, there was a one-day festival, where the students
picnicked, sang, danced in the gompa, played music and
hung around eating. Lama Yeshe also gave them the following
talk. Edited from the Lama Yeshe Wisdom Archive by Nicholas
Ribush. Printed in the December 2001 issue of Mandala
Magazine. |
From
the Buddhist point of view, the human consciousness, or mind,
is the source of all human activity. Therefore, human beings
can do all sorts of things, internal and external; human power
is such that we can do anything. We can put our energy
into any direction we choose. That’s the power that humans
have.
The
human mind is the source of all people’s happiness and unhappiness,
and the Buddha’s teaching emphasizes the gaining of discriminating
wisdom so that you can see the reality of your mental attitude
and thereby direct your life and energy in the right direction
towards tranquility and peace.
From
the Buddhist point of view, basic human nature is beautiful,
profound and clear. This is how you exist; it’s simply a matter
of recognizing your own profound qualities and seeing that
you have the potential for limitless development. Meditation
on the four immeasurables--limitless
love, limitless compassion, limitless joy, and limitless equilibrium--indicate
this.
The
reason that these four attitudes are called limitless is that
fundamentally, we do have love, compassion, joy and equilibrium,
but they are limited. We have love but it is limited love;
we have compassion, but it is limited compassion; we have
joyful appreciation of each other’s lives, but that joy is
limited; we have a certain degree of equilibrium, but it too
is limited. What prevents us from realizing the four immeasurables
is our ego; the ego mind. The view the ego mind perceives
is wrong, partial. Therefore, our loving kindness is very
narrow. First, we have to recognize this in order to expand
it.
Look how we limit our enjoyment. Intellectually, our minds
create the fabrication, “This object is my object of joy;
I cannot enjoy the rest.” Such preconceptions cement our minds
into fixed positions and are the result of our ego mind making
mistaken judgments and placing limitations on our thought--
“Only this object can bring me joy.”
The
purpose of practicing meditation on the four limitless qualities
is to free ourselves from extreme, neurotic ego games. But
don’t think, “Oh, now I understand that this is just an ego
game--tomorrow
I am going to give up ego games forever,” under the illusion
that overnight you can change radically and that the next
day your entire perspective on life will be completely different.
That sort of change is impossible. Powered by your ego mind,
you have constantly been generating deluded energy since beginningless
time; you can’t suddenly transform overnight simply by changing
your intellectual ideas. The way to overcome negative energy
is to act with understanding and awareness day by day, every
day. That’s what makes it possible to change and transform
your life.
The
reason we need meditation is that the ego game is extremely
subtle and can function at the level of the unconscious. Detecting
the activity of the ego game at the unconscious level is very
difficult. We need great energy and strong penetrative insight
to counteract the accumulated ego energy that has come from
eons of repeated ego games. To reverse this energy force,
we have to balance it. Therefore, it is not enough to merely
think, “Now I understand that the ego is the problem; now
I have understood” as a brief flash of insight. “Now I am
liberated. Today I have discovered my problem. This Buddhist
philosopher monk has told me all about my ego. Now I’m liberated.”
You can’t do that; that’s dreaming. What you have to do every
day is to develop comprehension of your own attitude, your
own mental activity, as much as you possibly can. This is
a very important point.
Today,
for example, you’ve been playing and dancing. If you have
inner awareness, you’ll see that your ego has been reacting
in a certain way. One song is a favorite, another song you
dislike; I am sure each of you has had this experience. When
you dance, there are certain moves you like; you think they’re
good; they make you happy. There are other dance moves that
you feel are stupid; no good. That’s the way you feel, and
every time you dance, you’re reacting in your mind. What Buddhist
meditation allows you to do is to see that good dancing has
value but so does bad. There’s nothing to react to emotionally.
Also,
the main reason I agreed to this festival, with its dancing,
fun and games, was that I thought you could learn something,
test and examine yourselves after doing the meditation course.
Each
of you should check up: you’ve done many things today--have
any of them really made you happy? Ask yourself this question,
right now: do you feel that what you’ve done today constitutes
a really happy life? Exhausting yourself through singing and
dancing--is
the exhausted life a happy one? This is very simple: your
mind interprets, “Today is festival day; we’re happy. Today
we’re going to get cake. We can give up morning meditation;
nobody’s pushing us to meditate.” So you simply hang about,
wandering aimlessly here and there, looking around. Do you
think that’s happy?
Some
people will learn, “Dancing and cake are good, but they’re
not the purpose of life.” In other words, you should not feel
that being allowed to dance and do whatever you like is the
definition of a really happy life. That’s a wrong attitude.
However, you don’t have to be miserable, either. If you can
interpret dancing as misery, similarly, you’ll think that
sitting in meditation must also be miserable.
Buddhist
philosophy teaches you to think logically; the Buddhist religion
is a philosophical religion, a logical religion. Let’s say
that you’ve been dancing for a while and suddenly stop. Your
ego reacts, “Oh, now my pleasure has gone.” Many people’s
ego will react like this, casting them into the same old darkness.
They’re up, full of energy; suddenly the party finishes and
they come back down. This up and down comes from ego, not
understanding what is real happiness or the reality of life.
All
such activity has to change; nothing lasts. Somehow you have
to learn to let your pleasures go without grasping at them
neurotically. This is very important. That’s why Buddhist
philosophy teaches that the whole world is like an illusion--you
cannot hold an illusion permanently; there is no solidity.
What you enjoy from moment to moment cannot be held permanently.
Its nature is impermanent, transitory; it passes, passes,
goes, goes, finishes, finishes. That’s the whole reality of
life.
Therefore,
it is very important to be aware of and accept that kind of
reality, as it is. You can do it. The Western ego suffers
greatly because of the quickly changing nature of society.
When you find you cannot function because society is moving
so quickly, you blame society. The nature of society is that
it is going to change; it is your own nature to change; it’s
the nature of weather to change. Therefore, it is very important
that your attitude is such that you follow the middle path
and avoid extremes. But doing that is not an easy job; you
need penetrative wisdom.
That’s
why we say meditation is worthwhile. Meditation does not mean
going into a cave. Just contemplate the movement of your own
actions—your breath, thoughts and everything else. That’s
enough. Also, don’t think that you are irreversibly confused
and unclear. That, too, is wrong. Your mind has clarity; clarity
is your mind’s ability to receive reflections of good and
bad. Everybody has that, even children. When children play,
they have some kind of discrimination. That is the beauty
of their consciousness. You can contemplate on your ability
to discriminate; that is the clarity of your mind. Contemplate
on that. If you believe that you are confused all the time,
of course, you’ll be confused.
Now,
instead of my going on any longer, are there any questions?
Student.
Lama, today we were dancing in the Gompa and I had a good
experience. It combined what you talked about in meditation.
There was the action but there was stillness as well. I was
exhausted, but I also got energy from it. I think organized
dancing is a good check up meditation, and I was wondering
if that sort of thing could be continued here?
Lama.
Well, that’s beautiful; I’m very happy. That was my idea in
having a festival, for people to relax and enjoy themselves.
We should not think that we are meditators, exclusive, special
people, and that the rest of society is dirty, sinful and
negative. That’s wrong, isn’t it? We are down to earth, and
understand and can relate with people. That’s good. Anyway,
the purpose of Chenrezig Institute is to serve the people
in society. We all come from society and therefore we need
to help the society.
Student.
I’m still not sure what you are suggesting is the most suitable
social life for the Western mind. You seem to be suggesting
that dancing and such activities are bad.
Lama.
No, I’m not saying that they are bad. Dancing is normal; it
is good. But I want you to understand, my point is that if
in dancing today your ego identifies that now, after suffering
for ten or fifteen days in the prison of meditation, today
is the happy life, if your ego interprets in this way, that
is a wrong conception. The reason I am using this example
is that it is fresh from our experience today. So our experiences
are our resource from which we see what is reality. Normally,
I use as examples whatever is close. If I see a flower somewhere,
to make a point I hold up that flower. So, we were dancing
today, and I use this energy as an example to demonstrate
reality.
Student.
I think you mean the mental attitude, Lama--the
way you approach meditation as two weeks in prison; the attitude
you dance with.
Lama.
That’s right, if the attitude is the ego game, it produces
the reaction of dissatisfaction and confusion.
Student.
I was wondering how to acquire self-discipline?
Lama.
If you can recognize how your mad elephant mind functions,
you’ll become disciplined automatically. When you finally
recognize your own mad elephant, undisciplined mind, you feel
that you cannot go on like this any longer, always leading
yourself on the wrong path and always finishing up miserable.
So you question and examine your own mind, and then put some
limits on the wrong attitude. When you find the right attitude
coming, let go. From the point of view of Buddhist philosophy,
discipline comes from wisdom; it is not something imposed
upon you by lamas or priests. For example, I have to make
my own discipline; nobody can force me to stay here. If I
want to go to Brisbane tonight and enjoy myself in a nightclub
I can choose. So, we need to discipline the mad elephant mind;
everybody has to. But once you reach beyond the mad elephant
ego, you don’t need discipline; you are already disciplined.
Student.
Lama, I’ve found that dancing complements meditation and is
not necessarily a temporal pleasure, that dancing can have
lasting benefit.
Lama.
I’m very happy that you’ve had that good experience. I am
not saying that dancing itself is simply a fleeting pleasure;
it depends on mental attitude. Your experience of dancing
has value. If you contemplate on and remember your experiences
continuously, that continued memory can keep you from depression.
The thing is that if we cannot recollect good experiences,
cannot maintain their value, later we can get depressed. Just
as you have experienced, everybody else has to some extent
had some sort of clear, blissful experience. The thing is
that we can’t maintain the continuity of the memory of that
good experience, the clarity. Therefore, one minute we are
clear, the next, polluted. That’s why we need some kind of
balance--so
that we can hold the memory of the good experience instead
of thinking garbage all the time. That’s what makes us up
and down. However, every human being has such clear, happy,
blissful experiences. The problem is that we don’t contemplate
in a penetrated way or remember those experiences continuously.
Student.
Lama, how can Westerners approach sex in a more positive,
unattached way?
Lama.
Well, the simple way is to have a giving attitude instead
of a grasping one; to be more concerned with giving or sharing
pleasure with another than with, “I want pleasure.”
Student.
But often that is interpreted as feeding the other person’s
ego.
Lama.
No, not necessarily. Anyway, your responsibility is to develop
a giving attitude. The other person may be self-cherishing,
but that is his or her responsibility. Your responsibility
is to abandon your uptight, grasping game. To do that, you
need to develop giving. Most of the time, I tell you, the
ego game between Western couples is that neither of them is
satisfied by sense pleasure and then they say, “Oh, you’re
no good; I don’t like you.” They blame each other. If you
are not concerned with fulfilling your own sense-gravitation
attachment, it’s okay. Are we communicating or not?
Student.
It’s a difficult one, though.
Lama.
Yes, of course! That’s why you came to the meditation course.
It is difficult, but definitely you can learn. The thing is
that Mahayana Buddhism teaches that you can touch this flower
without having the neurotic, grasping mind. If you can see
the possibility with this flower, ask yourself why. Then,
slowly, slowly you can relate this experience to other relationships
as well. First of all, the Western mind strongly believes,
“I should have satisfaction from this.” Let’s say that I’m
a Westerner and you are my girlfriend. I have the attitude
that you should make me satisfied, otherwise you
are the failure. Can you imagine that? Completely egotistical
mind. From the Buddhist point of view, that is completely
wrong. That is a completely wrong attitude: you are
my girlfriend, so you should give me complete satisfaction,
and if you don’t give me that you are a bad lady. It’s the
same thing in the reverse way, with ladies too. Basically,
this is wrong. First of all, I should recognize that my satisfaction
comes from myself, from me, not from you, my girlfriend. If
I believe that basically my happiness depends on my girlfriend--“As
long as she exists, I’ll be happy; if she no longer exists,
my happiness will be lost.” That is a very dangerous, deluded
thought. There are many things in the Western attitude that
need to be changed. The Western attitude is so concrete. Scientific
education teaches you wrong conceptions and beliefs—the belief,
“This should make me happy. If this doesn’t
make me happy, I’m lost.”
Student.
Could you please give me some advice on how to relate to people
who have not had Dharma teachings when I get home?
Lama.
First of all, when you go back home, I think it is better
if you relax and be natural, simple and spontaneous. Act according
to Dharma as much as you can, but do not talk philosophically
as we have been doing here. If you push the intellectual side
too much, people will treat you as some kind of outcast; it
will be strange for them. But if you are happy, relaxed, logical
and reasonable, they will feel, “I don’t know this man. How
come? Something is going on in his mind; he’s changed so much
for the better.” Perhaps one day they will ask, “What are
you doing? Tell me what you’re into.” At that time, you have
to be ready with sharp wisdom and give just the right reply.
Until then, relax; be simple. I also understand that you can’t
do the things we do here. Here we do early morning meditation,
prostrations, prayer and these things. You can’t do those
things too much socially. But still, you can meditate without
involving the ritual aspects. You can do internal rituals;
external ones are not necessary. I think that’s simple. You
have to learn how to use each environment, how to actualize,
how to utilize that energy in the path to enlightenment. I
think that is necessary. Otherwise, you might feel, “Now I
cannot meditate because I have no temple.” Perhaps you thought
that for meditation you needed a temple or some kind of material
Buddha. “Now there is no Buddha, no lama, no temple, I cannot
meditate.” That’s not realistic, but I understand. Many people,
after they have learned meditation and philosophy, go back
home with the ambition of putting this small baby buddha into
their family and friends. Then those people really dislike
that; it’s not so good. I think first we need to grow our
baby buddha bigger and bigger. He should be at least middle-aged
in order for us to push that energy to others. The first important
thing is for we ourselves to be together; after that we can
teach.
I
think that’s all. Excuse me, I would like to talk more, but
time is running. What to do? Thank you very much.
|